CIO, the CIC alternative that could be the better choice

Last time, I made the case for the Community Interest Company: when it fits, and why it works so well for the right organisation. But I ended on an honest note. A CIC is not the right answer for everyone. So to close this short series, I want to look at the structure that is often the better choice for the organisations a CIC does not suit: the Charitable Incorporated Organisation, or CIO.

What a CIO actually is

A CIO is a registered charity with its own legal identity. That second part matters. Like a CIC, it gives you limited liability, so the people running it are protected in a way the older unincorporated charity models never allowed. But unlike a CIC, it is regulated solely by the Charity Commission. There is no Companies House filing and no second regulator to answer to, just the one relationship. Since it was introduced, the CIO has become the default choice for most new charities in England and Wales.

There are two versions, and the difference is straightforward. In a foundation CIO, the trustees are the only members, which suits smaller organisations where the board is effectively the whole show. In an association CIO, there is a wider voting membership sitting alongside the trustees, which suits organisations that want their members to have a formal say.

Where the CIO wins

The clearest advantage is tax. A CIO does not pay corporation tax on income tied to its charitable purpose, and it can claim Gift Aid, which adds 25% to eligible donations at no cost to the donor. It usually qualifies for significant business rates relief too. If your income is going to come mainly from donations and grants, those reliefs make a real difference to what you can actually deliver.

There is also the question of access. Some grant funders and trusts will only give to registered charities. If you have ever had a funding application turned down because you were not a charity, you will know how much that can matter. Charitable status opens doors that a CIC, for all its strengths, sometimes cannot.

The trade-offs

None of this comes for free. Charities can only trade in limited ways, so if you plan to earn a large share of your income commercially, you may end up needing a separate trading arm, which adds cost and complexity. The Charity Commission is a more hands-on regulator than the CIC Regulator, and the reporting expected of a charity is more demanding. And paying the people who run the organisation is harder: trustees are generally unpaid, and funders tend to want the balance of control to sit with unpaid, unconflicted people. If you need to draw a salary as the founder and decision-maker, that is a genuine tension to think through.

Which one fits you

So how do you tell? The honest short version is this. If you expect to earn most of your income by trading, want to pay yourself and your team as directors, and value speed and flexibility, the CIC I wrote about last time is usually the better home. If you expect to rely on donations and grants, want the tax reliefs and the credibility that charitable status brings, and are comfortable with a heavier governance load, the CIO is well worth the extra effort to set up.

A real example

Heart of Headcorn is a long-established charity client of ours. They approached us for help at start-up and wanted guidance on which model to adopt. They chose a CIO, despite our recommendations, and after three years of operating, Bella, her volunteers and her trustees are doing well. The organisation's culture is much more charity-centric: do as much as possible for free, keep costs low, do as much with volunteers as possible, and apply for grants to cover the costs they cannot cover themselves. Bella is backed up by a board of trustees who collectively ensure that the running of the Heart of Headcorn centre is done in a way that complies completely with the Charity Commission. It is a good reminder that the founder often knows their own culture better than anyone, and that the right structure is the one that fits how you actually want to work.

Closing the series

That brings this short series to a close. Over three pieces I have asked whether the CIC bubble has burst, made the case for when a CIC fits, and now set out the CIO as the alternative that is sometimes the better call. If there is one thread running through all three, it is this: there is no single right structure, only the one that fits your mission, your income and the way you want to work.

Getting that choice right at the outset saves a great deal of time, money and difficulty later. If you would like to work through it for your own organisation, I offer a free 45-minute advice session. Book one and we will find the structure that fits.

Never miss a practical update from the Kent and Medway social enterprise world. Sign up to the CAP Enterprise newsletter and we will keep you in the loop.